It's a beautiful manuscript.
I've looked at it quite a bit as well, about half a year ago, but can't come up with anything concrete either.
One of the things I noticed is that it's a more southern Greco-Roman style of imagery (in terms of the zodiacs). For example, Cancer is a crab (not a crayfish), Virgo has wings, the scorpion is a real scorpion (not the scorpion lizard), Sagittarius is a centaur, etc. And it leans more toward astronomy (as it was in medieval times) rather than astrology, in the sense of illustrating a wide range of constellations (including Draco, Ursa major and minor, Corona, et al). It's not a mathematical work of astronomy (it's a fairly primitive interpretation), but it's not specifically focused on astrology.
I've looked at it quite a bit as well, about half a year ago, but can't come up with anything concrete either.
One of the things I noticed is that it's a more southern Greco-Roman style of imagery (in terms of the zodiacs). For example, Cancer is a crab (not a crayfish), Virgo has wings, the scorpion is a real scorpion (not the scorpion lizard), Sagittarius is a centaur, etc. And it leans more toward astronomy (as it was in medieval times) rather than astrology, in the sense of illustrating a wide range of constellations (including Draco, Ursa major and minor, Corona, et al). It's not a mathematical work of astronomy (it's a fairly primitive interpretation), but it's not specifically focused on astrology.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)