27-10-2025, 11:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 27-10-2025, 11:15 AM by Mark Knowles.)
(27-10-2025, 12:56 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(26-10-2025, 12:28 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But what about ail , aiil?
They could be mapped to some number, but they are very rare.
I question whether rarity is so relevant in this context and in the context of the Voynich text as a whole. This notion that some text or character is "rare" is often used as a gotcha, meaning it is "rare" therefore it can happily be ignored. However, is one then arguing that the writing of such characters was a mistake on behalf of the author(s)? If it is deliberate, as it appears, then one ought to interpret it seriously. I am now coming to the end of a long study of the distinctive and rarer text in the Voynich and I am being cautious about excluding text on the basis that it looks unusual. Of course, the author(s) must have made some writing errors, but I think one must exercise great care in making such an assessment in each and every case.

