25-10-2025, 06:43 PM
Well...
I don't get one thing...
You say (like most people) that Voynich has a non-random structure. But on both graphs it appears really close to Torsten Timm text.
Actually Torsten Timm point is the nearest to Voynich point on both graphs.
And Torsten Timm point is in many dimensions somewhere in the middle of meaningful texts. It's leftmost only on one dimension. It doesn't stand out of the crowd in your tests.
So my question is - are these actually good measures if text is meaningful or gibberish? What do they actually measure?
I don't get one thing...
You say (like most people) that Voynich has a non-random structure. But on both graphs it appears really close to Torsten Timm text.
Actually Torsten Timm point is the nearest to Voynich point on both graphs.
And Torsten Timm point is in many dimensions somewhere in the middle of meaningful texts. It's leftmost only on one dimension. It doesn't stand out of the crowd in your tests.
So my question is - are these actually good measures if text is meaningful or gibberish? What do they actually measure?