13-10-2025, 08:32 PM
I believe that all three are in the same hand, but that may not help us all that much.
* The Voynichese on f17r is by scribe 1. So it is either by him or anyone who decided the page needed a marginal annotation.
* You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (with the "der mus del" or whatever) is part of Quire 8, two bifolios with mixed scribes, subject matter... This bifolio has scribes 1 and 5.
* You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. was an empty page and likely still had "last page" appeal, whether the pages were bound or not. Again, anyone who was around the project in the early 15th century could have used this.
For me, scribe 1 is equally a contender, though I'm not certain either way.
* The Voynichese on f17r is by scribe 1. So it is either by him or anyone who decided the page needed a marginal annotation.
* You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (with the "der mus del" or whatever) is part of Quire 8, two bifolios with mixed scribes, subject matter... This bifolio has scribes 1 and 5.
* You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. was an empty page and likely still had "last page" appeal, whether the pages were bound or not. Again, anyone who was around the project in the early 15th century could have used this.
For me, scribe 1 is equally a contender, though I'm not certain either way.