It's surely a possibility, and a constructed/philosophical language may possibly explain some statistics of the text, ie., the word structure. The problem is cracking it in a clear, demonstrable way (it's unfortunately rather easy to assign arbitrary meanings to glyphs groups and reconstruct a more or less coherent, and fully invented, text/meaning).
|
Possibility for an a-priori constructed philosophical mathematical language
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Constructed Language Hypothesis | pfeaster | 30 | 26,052 |
06-04-2024, 07:04 AM Last Post: Aga Tentakulus |
|
| A priori or A posteriori cracking? | Arichichi | 9 | 9,524 |
25-02-2023, 11:20 PM Last Post: Mark Knowles |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

