07-10-2025, 09:05 PM
Excuse the intrusion, I'm a programmer (a very bad one), I want to share my perspective if you don't mind.Is it a feasible theory that each paragraph is a block composed of lines that are in turn self-sufficient?Each line would represent a different but sequential process, meaning you could only complete the second line once the first line of the block was done and executed.
Thanks to the guy who started this thread, I was able to see the patterns at both the beginning and end of the lines.That would also perhaps explain the text's weak narrative structure, but it does have a certain component of logical processes... Like A-> B-> C
Here are some prefixes and labels that end on each line and are constantly repeated.
Prefixes qok–, ot–, d–, y– Which usually start the supposed instructions
Suffixes or tags ending sequences -dy, -ain, -al, -ol
In short, each block or paragraph is composed of different processes that begin and end on a single line. But this only applies to the botany section; I haven't explored the rest of the manuscript yet.
Thanks to the guy who started this thread, I was able to see the patterns at both the beginning and end of the lines.That would also perhaps explain the text's weak narrative structure, but it does have a certain component of logical processes... Like A-> B-> C
Here are some prefixes and labels that end on each line and are constantly repeated.
Prefixes qok–, ot–, d–, y– Which usually start the supposed instructions
Suffixes or tags ending sequences -dy, -ain, -al, -ol
In short, each block or paragraph is composed of different processes that begin and end on a single line. But this only applies to the botany section; I haven't explored the rest of the manuscript yet.