The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $can_link - Line: 6 - File: showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code 6 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1658 eval




What's the evidence that the colors were added later?
#5
(29-09-2025, 01:43 PM)RobGea wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.ciphermysteries --> "Voynich colour inference, a sure path to madness…"
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

My understanding of the arguments:

* Different painting techniques are observed in different places. --> as I argued before, the paint job has the appearance of someone attempting to do something they don't quite master. Picking one awful thing as original and another as later is arbitrary.
* There are no bright yellow flowers --> This is an anomaly indeed, but one of the overall color scheme. See You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 
* There have been several rebindings (implied: shuffling) of the folios. Paint transfers have taken place while the manuscript was in its current order. --> according to Lisa's latest research, the first binding was already in this order. With some goodwill, we can say that the MS was likely painted after it was bound, quite possibly still in the 15th century.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: What's the evidence that the colors were added later? - by Koen G - 29-09-2025, 02:08 PM
Evidence from pages f33v-f40r - by Jorge_Stolfi - 23-07-2026, 07:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)