10-09-2025, 12:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-09-2025, 12:17 AM by anyasophira.)
(09-09-2025, 09:12 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(09-09-2025, 02:46 AM)anyasophira wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well my question wasn’t based on the premise that I was a few clicks away from finding a manuscript “Rosetta Stone”.
[..]
Funny thing: that is the best hope one can have about VMS...
The author(s) showed some very few tendencies to use inspirations (or rather flat copies) from other books.
In best case there is a just-copied manuscript page somewhere in this world, helping to explain it's counterpart in VMS.
-has that been backed up by some quantified trends? If the research has been shown I would love to see that. Like if the time period that the manuscript was a part of - has what was likely to be drawn or shown or discussed or even -how- the subjects were shown - are they more like those manuscripts of the time rather say the 1700’s or 1800’s or even modern works of zodiac signs or herbals? Or earlier? Because for sure the Voynich appears unusual, but again, imagine if that unknown script was found on some of the manuscripts we can read - how strange would those appear. We know that a book of its type has not been identified out there, but in pieces do the sum of the parts still add up to more overlap to 1400’s middle Europe that than 1700’s ?