Combination of two manuscripts as a way of reading the text?

[sfiesta]

Something like this is possible, though I personally wouldn't look in the direction of two parts of a code that have to be combined. (This is a personal preference without any evidence). What I feel is more likely is that the text in the VM was sufficient for someone to recall a memorized text (which may or may not be from a written source). 

I'm not saying that I think this is what happened, but it is possible. So yes, the theory has the right to exist. It suffers from the same issue as the "nonsense text" theory though: we will probably never prove it. Nor disprove it, as long as the MS remains unsolved.

I agree with you. This theory can neither be proven nor disproved. However, it may explain why no one has managed to decipher the manuscript for so many years. It may explain the unnatural distribution of words in the manuscript and the distribution of symbols in words.

Finally, I would like to leave a visual illustration of my theory for those readers who will not immediately understand what I mean.