[Article] Category-based dynamics in the Voynich Manuscript (draft)

[oshfdk]

I think the paper is too technical for me. Is it possible to have some high level summary of the findings? I've tried checking the abstract and the conclusion, but still don't understand the significance of the result.

In this paper, I have hoped to show many words are “dominant” in a certain category, even with Currier languages. Additionally, many words are formed of an affix and a common dominant word, and there is relatively high amount of self-redirection with descendant words. I’ve also shown that Currier languages are highly linked to main (i.e. first) PCA Component on a PCA of the VM.

Could you explain what this means in practical sense? I'm mostly interested in anything that could lead to deciphering of the manuscript (if it can be deciphered). The fact that some sections of the manuscript have significantly different vocabulary (if this is what the results show) could mean many things: semantic differences or stylistic differences dictated by the topics in the text, differences in encryption or just different authors with their own idiosyncrasies. 

For next steps, deciding the process which words are not easily connected to dominant words are formed, since rarer words are more unusual, would be helpful at working a provisional translation.

I'm not sure I understand this part at all, but I'm intrigued by "working a provisional translation". Could you elaborate?