Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript
#28
To evaluate whether the distribution of topics depends on another categorical variable (e.g., language A vs. B, or the 5 scribal hands), I used a chi-square test of independence.

For this, I used the contingency tables that are plotted in my post (the heatmaps of topic vs. language / topic vs. hand).

- Rows represent the different topics.
- Columns represent the categories of the variable of interest (e.g., Language A, B, or Hand 1–5).
-Each cell contains the observed frequency (the count of how often a given topic occurs with that category).

The null hypothesisis is: 

H₀: topics are independent of language/hand.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a chi-square statistic at least as extreme as the observed one, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

A low p-value (e.g., < 0.05) means we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the distribution of topics depends on the language or scribal hand.

A high p-value means we cannot reject the null, suggesting no evidence of dependence.

In both cases, we have a very low p-value (lowest when we analyze the topics vs. hands), rejecting the null hipotesis that topics are independent of.language/hand.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Automated Topic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript - by quimqu - 22-08-2025, 07:53 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How Different is Each Topic Each Other - Term Frequency Across Topic A.Wilmarth 6 7,137 31-07-2024, 04:28 PM
Last Post: RobGea
  Hypervector Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript dvallis 126 111,352 15-09-2020, 08:53 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)