18-08-2025, 01:43 AM
If you're referring to f. 116v, I'm always willing to have my mind changed if the evidence is compelling! Your work is methodical and comprehensive, and I'm happy to change my assessment based on that evidence. I do think, based on the script, that the inscription on f. 116v was not written by one of the five scribes, which suggests it might not be original but is a slightly later addition, but your work does suggest that it was added in the first half of the century.
You don't want to miss my Toronto lecture on Sept 26...I'll be debuting some new and startling results of the work Colin and I have been doing for the last year!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You don't want to miss my Toronto lecture on Sept 26...I'll be debuting some new and startling results of the work Colin and I have been doing for the last year!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)