Stellar, you're seeing what you want to see.
You left out some of the shapes that are there and misread ones that aren't. Why are you ignoring the shapes next to the "name" that are more clear than the ones you marked?
Also, it's a bad idea to write over the marks. It's better to write next to them or to use dots (small ones), rather than lines that obscure the actual image.
Good research is about figuring out what is there.
Bad research is assuming what is there, and who wrote it, and imposing that idea on the data.
And why would John Dee misspell his own name when it's hidden under the paint? It's spelled Ioannis (not Ioaniss).
You left out some of the shapes that are there and misread ones that aren't. Why are you ignoring the shapes next to the "name" that are more clear than the ones you marked?
Also, it's a bad idea to write over the marks. It's better to write next to them or to use dots (small ones), rather than lines that obscure the actual image.
Good research is about figuring out what is there.
Bad research is assuming what is there, and who wrote it, and imposing that idea on the data.
And why would John Dee misspell his own name when it's hidden under the paint? It's spelled Ioannis (not Ioaniss).