(07-10-2016, 08:18 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What does the cube that I image processed have to do with your interpretation of the letters you found? You posted it in such a way that it seems to imply support of your idea that John Dee signed this, but it does not.
There are letters in many of the images so I did some image processing on the folio you posted.
Here's what happened. If there's text in there (it looks like there might be but it's extremely small) it doesn't look anything like "John Dee" (regardless of whether it's viewed upside-down or rightside-up):
![[Image: F53rText.png]](http://voynichportal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/F53rText.png)
JKP,
You have to invert the image.
![[Image: CuJhVsrUsAAZop4.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuJhVsrUsAAZop4.jpg)
(07-10-2016, 08:20 AM)Koen Gh. wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It looks like those lines are many times thinner than the ones used in regular drawing - is that even possible/plausible?
Why not? I see information here and info requires intelligence which this man had! A sharp point with ink could do it and that's why the letters are not uniform as evident in the, "n". It's small no doubt yet the n is a give away along with the SS's. they all appear with straight lines.