And If I get things correctly, your result is that Voynich text is very predictable, you can predict next letter based on previous letter with a good ratio. It's hardly surprising, people in these forums often talk about it. Just more often they call it low entropy instead of low perplexity but it'd say it's more or less the same.
It would be interesting to me to see how prediction of not letters but complete words works in VM compared to other, real texts. It was again often said in these forums that there arent repeatable word sequences in VM but maybe we are wrong about it???
By the way, what do you mean by Ambrosius Mediolanensis? He was a man, not a book
It would be interesting to me to see how prediction of not letters but complete words works in VM compared to other, real texts. It was again often said in these forums that there arent repeatable word sequences in VM but maybe we are wrong about it???
By the way, what do you mean by Ambrosius Mediolanensis? He was a man, not a book