14-06-2025, 08:12 AM
Just finished watching the webinar with Dr Lisa Fagin Davis. My understanding of her position on the Voynich manuscript is as follows:
- it is an authentic medieval document (not a modern hoax or fake)
- it shows evidence of continuous use and reference, by a person or persons who presumably understood the content
- it is written on vellum from the early 1400s
- the illustrations are firmly within the tradition of Western European medieval manuscripts (not, for example, Middle Eastern, not Oriental, not Meso-American)
- the text has the structure and the statistical properties of a natural human language with an alphabet
- the underlying language is unknown
- there were five scribes
- all claims of a "solution" (in the sense of identifying the meaning of the text) are unfounded.

