06-06-2025, 11:06 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2025, 11:09 AM by dashstofsk.
Edit Reason: corrected grammar
)
(06-06-2025, 10:02 AM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.if there is no way to prove it wrong, there is no way to prove it right either
Proof? You want proof? I have bad news for you. There is no proof. It is clear there never will be proof. If you are waiting for proof you will still be waiting in a hundred years time. Can you wait that long?
To understand the purpose of this manuscript we need instead to look at what is logical, possible, probable, plausible. It is my belief that people are thinking too hard about the manuscript. A simple solution is probably more likely. Something more in keeping with other 'secret' manuscripts of the period. A new alphabet for an existing language - not possible. An alphabet for an unknown language - improbable. Random gibberish - improbable, illogical. Encyphered text and to necessarily have to do it for all the ~36000 words - possible, not simple, not plausible. An artificial construction fraudulently created to sell on the market for a fortune in florins - plausible and simple.