Why not positional variation?
#49
(10-05-2025, 11:00 PM)extent_of_foxes wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.what's going at the top-right corner of f3r? "daimm"

I take it you are curious to know more about the funny character  m. This might be a good opportunity to say something what I think might be happening. In my opinion  m might be the same as  r. There are several pieces of evidence that led me to this possibility.

Firstly have a look at some matrices of affinities for characters. Here they are, for the Herbal A1 pages and for the Bio B2 pages.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

You will notice that the values for the character pairs  ar,am,or,om  are all high. What is this thing that I call affinity? It is a measure of the liking that each character in a pair has for the other character. Thus when the measure for  ar in Herbal A1 is 5 this means that  ar occurs 5 times what would be expected if characters  a  and  r  appeared randomly. In Bio B2 the value is 9.21. Neither  r nor  m have any particular affinity with any other character. These affinity values immediately suggest that there is some commonality in the two characters.

Now list the top  m words and then count the words in which  m is replaced by  r.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Generally you will see that where there is an  m word there will be an  r word, and that the top  m words generally give top  r words. Again, commonality.

Also there is the visual evidence. From You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

   


Both characters start with a downstroke and have an upwards loop from near the top. The difference is that  m continues the loop with a downward swing. Otherwise both characters have the same 'body'. In both the top loop has the same forward lean. Why the downswing? I suspect that it might be just a particular whim of the authors. All of them tend to like to finish words with a flourish.  l,y,r,n  are most frequently placed at the end of a word. But also perhaps it pleases the authors to occasionally close a line with a visual kick to emphasize the ending. And we all know that  m occurs generally at the line ends. Definitely so by hands 2 and 3 who write in language B. Hand 1 ( language A ) likes to use it mid-word also ( notably f3r, f3v, f24r, f24v, f52r, f54r, f54v. But notice also a strange thing, that of these, pairs f3r/v and f24r/v and f54r/v are on opposite sides of a page which suggests that the author might have done the pairs in one sitting. )
[+] 1 user says Thank You to dashstofsk for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 06-09-2024, 03:30 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 07-09-2024, 12:46 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 07-09-2024, 09:16 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 08-09-2024, 01:50 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 08-09-2024, 03:57 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 18-04-2025, 05:57 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 08-09-2024, 11:43 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 08-09-2024, 01:44 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 08-09-2024, 05:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Rafal - 08-09-2024, 09:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by MarcoP - 09-09-2024, 07:57 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 09-09-2024, 08:57 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by MarcoP - 09-09-2024, 09:55 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by pfeaster - 14-09-2024, 01:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 14-09-2024, 04:27 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 14-09-2024, 04:54 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 09-09-2024, 10:11 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by MarcoP - 09-09-2024, 10:36 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 09-09-2024, 11:05 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RobGea - 09-09-2024, 07:57 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 09-09-2024, 09:00 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 10-09-2024, 12:12 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 10-09-2024, 04:24 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 10-09-2024, 05:37 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Barbrey - 26-09-2024, 06:43 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 26-09-2024, 12:48 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Barbrey - 27-09-2024, 10:13 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Scarecrow - 27-09-2024, 07:21 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 17-04-2025, 03:10 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 17-04-2025, 05:39 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Mauro - 17-04-2025, 06:47 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 07:51 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 19-04-2025, 08:04 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 01:00 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 19-04-2025, 02:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 19-04-2025, 01:08 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 02:10 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 02:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Mauro - 19-04-2025, 07:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 20-04-2025, 07:27 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by nablator - 10-05-2025, 11:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 11-05-2025, 04:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 05:00 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 11-05-2025, 06:06 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 07:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by nablator - 11-05-2025, 08:45 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 09:12 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by nablator - 11-05-2025, 09:23 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by R. Sale - 11-05-2025, 07:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 08:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 12:37 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by R. Sale - 11-05-2025, 09:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 02:03 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 12-05-2025, 03:41 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 04:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 04:34 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 12-05-2025, 04:35 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 04:40 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 12-05-2025, 04:54 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 07:40 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 13-05-2025, 12:29 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 13-05-2025, 08:04 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)