Why not positional variation?

[dashstofsk]

an ending equivalence r ≅ ii ≅ in or otherwise?

In the Glen Claston transliteration ( GC2a-n.txt from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and using the v101 alphabet ) in, iin, iiin are considered to be separate characters. Also ir and iir. If you were to list the words ending in and alongside each count the occurrences for the same word that ends in iin you would notice that their frequencies tend to be linked. See some of my results for quire 20. Where there is an in word you have an iin word.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

   

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

   

My reading of this result is that in and iin words must be the same. The author's mind is sometimes in single stroke mode, and at other times in double stroke mode.