[Blog Post] Extra 'c' as null character on 102r2
#3
(06-04-2025, 01:51 AM)tavie wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.102r2 is part of the "pharmaceutical" section of the manuscript, and this section has been identified as having a greater frequency of the /eo/ bigram than the herbal folios.

But this eo-rich area includes the "late" Herbal A folios (f87, f90, f93, f96).

The frequency of eo in Herbal A is very inconsistent: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

@SherriMM:
Could the vocabulary of other pairs of eo-poor and eo-rich pages be linked like f32v-f102r2? It would be interesting to check (somehow, but it seems difficult) if the relation is something special or just a consequence of the presence of many similar words everywhere.
[+] 2 users say Thank You to nablator for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Extra 'c' as null character on 102r2 - by nablator - 06-04-2025, 11:11 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: