Why not positional variation?

[zachary.kaelan]

I've been experimenting with decomposing EVA characters further and running statistics on them (probably something similar to the curve line system), and I discovered the possibility of positional variation while doing so.

Roughly 43.34% of words end in the y/m/g-type curve, 19.07% end in the r/s-type curve, 15.72% end in the n curve, and 15.08% end in l, which adds up to around 93.21%. Around 2.93% of words end in o and 1.58% end in d, making up most of the remainder, leaving 2.28%. If I exclude labels, titles, and shorter words, none of the numbers change much, but added together the remainder shrinks to 1.17%.

Of the remainder, most are either gallows, e, or a.