[Blog Post] New blogpost

[zachary.kaelan]

My opinion on q9. I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the holes between pages 67v2 and 67v1 do not match the existing book block pillars. This gives grounds to consider the option that this quire was taken from another manuscript.

In a You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. you had on the subject, you mentioned the possibility that carbon dating would show something different for Q9. I'd like to bring up that one of the pages carbon dated actually was You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. from Q9, and the dating for that page was slightly off compared to the others.