28-02-2025, 01:37 PM
It should follow nicely from the data that indeed rarer words are more unusual (defined by similarity or Levenshtein distance) for length (2,8). This also can be viewed simply looking at one of my other posts about the most common words in the manuscript. There (even with ignoring hapax), it can be seen to be true. This follows a theme that more the rarer words are derivational upon (shorter) common words in which further empirical proofs should illuminate, when satisfactory thought and formatting should provide for more befitting posts.