19-02-2025, 11:45 PM
It's definitely worth keeping in mind. I noticed this when looking at this manuscript: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Even after realising that the symbol is a 5, and drilling it into my mind that it is a 5, it's really really easy to fall back into reading these as 1441, 1442 etc.
I can imagine a tired or overworked expert making the same mistake, although I don't know how widespread mis-dating due to that really is.
Even after realising that the symbol is a 5, and drilling it into my mind that it is a 5, it's really really easy to fall back into reading these as 1441, 1442 etc.
I can imagine a tired or overworked expert making the same mistake, although I don't know how widespread mis-dating due to that really is.