25-09-2016, 12:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 25-09-2016, 12:42 PM by Diane.
Edit Reason: add quote.
)
Emma,
re 'that's what [Jacques] Guy said'... it's true that his "proto-Mandarin" storyline began as a joke, but it didn't end there.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
To save everyone following the link, here's the important bit.
What you will not find, however, is what followed the Chinese canard. In 1997, a new member of our Voynich interest group, Jorge Stolfi, a professor of computer science, came up with statistical evidence that the structure of "Voynichese" was very similar to that of Mandarin Chinese. Highly sceptical, I set about finding flaws in his data or his reasoning. I could fault neither, and I wrote as much, just as emphatically as I had confessed to my Chinese hoax. There was then a lively exchange lasting some two years, with evidence mounting for the Chinese-like structure of Voynichese.
re 'that's what [Jacques] Guy said'... it's true that his "proto-Mandarin" storyline began as a joke, but it didn't end there.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
To save everyone following the link, here's the important bit.
What you will not find, however, is what followed the Chinese canard. In 1997, a new member of our Voynich interest group, Jorge Stolfi, a professor of computer science, came up with statistical evidence that the structure of "Voynichese" was very similar to that of Mandarin Chinese. Highly sceptical, I set about finding flaws in his data or his reasoning. I could fault neither, and I wrote as much, just as emphatically as I had confessed to my Chinese hoax. There was then a lively exchange lasting some two years, with evidence mounting for the Chinese-like structure of Voynichese.


