17-09-2016, 06:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-09-2016, 06:53 PM by Wladimir D.)
(17-09-2016, 07:04 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think the number of <e> characters is significant, so much so that I immediately rejected the Takahashi transcription and created my own, partly because he neglected to include some of the <e> glyphs, almost as if he were reluctant to accept that there could be three or sometimes four in a row. That kind of editing, based on preconceived notions of natural language, can affect the results.
I think it's entirely possible that <ee> (which I call <cc> because I don't like imposing meaning on the shape of the glyphs) could be a digraph and may function separately or differently from a single <e>.
For example. Sometimes, even the carrier of the Russian language with great difficulty can read the handwritten words contains the consecutive "eeeeeeeeee", as there are the letters “и, ш, щ, ц"

