17-09-2016, 11:29 AM
(17-09-2016, 10:50 AM)Koen Gh. wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.No, you are right Marco. This is the reason why I originally used the word "refer". Does anyone have a suggestion for a better phrasing?
What we want to say is basically that there are only plants, and not, for example, beaver testicles or other animal ingredients. This is relevant because animal parts were used in various traditions, and hence depicted in some manuscripts.
I agree with this, but can we hope to have wide agreement on the concept of "ingredients"? What about your You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.?
Slightly off-topic: it is interesting that 116v has animal ingredients (possibly as many as 3: billy goat liver, goat milk and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. / rennet-bag). But this is not part of the herbal or pharma sections.