17-09-2016, 10:50 AM
No, you are right Marco. This is the reason why I originally used the word "refer". Does anyone have a suggestion for a better phrasing?
What we want to say is basically that there are only plants, and not, for example, beaver testicles or other animal ingredients. This is relevant because animal parts were used in various traditions, and hence depicted in some manuscripts.
What we want to say is basically that there are only plants, and not, for example, beaver testicles or other animal ingredients. This is relevant because animal parts were used in various traditions, and hence depicted in some manuscripts.