10-10-2024, 07:14 AM
While I see the abundant repetitions, I do wonder whether this part is considered especially rich in them based on a visual impression, or if there is some metric that could be used to quantify it.
I wonder about this, because impressions may be subjective, and it is possible, even likely, that not all parts of the text have been looked at equally intensively, or even at all.
The absence of q is certainly interesting. This is something that the zodial labels and the zodiac circular texts have in common. That is however markedly more the case in the 'early' signs (which includes Aries) than in the later signs.
I wonder about this, because impressions may be subjective, and it is possible, even likely, that not all parts of the text have been looked at equally intensively, or even at all.
The absence of q is certainly interesting. This is something that the zodial labels and the zodiac circular texts have in common. That is however markedly more the case in the 'early' signs (which includes Aries) than in the later signs.