Why not positional variation?
#10
I'm not any kind of expert on Voynich Manuscript but for me so called "n" also looks like a final "i".
You guys don't care to educate the beginners so let me try to do it Smile



In medieval manuscripts when Roman numerals were written , the final "I" for one was often written in a different way than earlier Is. It looked more similar to modern "j" letter:
Here is a part of a list of popes which their reigning times, I marked the numbers with last I being different:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.


There was some very practical reason about it - nobody could falsify your numbers but adding some extra "I" here and there. With that "j" sign you were sure where they end.

And we have serious reasons to believe that Voynich letters behave similarly to numbers or, to make a stronger claim, they are some mutated numbers.
But I agree that at this moment it's just a hypothesis.
[+] 3 users say Thank You to Rafal for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 06-09-2024, 03:30 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 07-09-2024, 12:46 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 07-09-2024, 09:16 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 08-09-2024, 01:50 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 08-09-2024, 03:57 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 18-04-2025, 05:57 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 08-09-2024, 11:43 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 08-09-2024, 01:44 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 08-09-2024, 05:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Rafal - 08-09-2024, 09:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by MarcoP - 09-09-2024, 07:57 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 09-09-2024, 08:57 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by MarcoP - 09-09-2024, 09:55 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by pfeaster - 14-09-2024, 01:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 14-09-2024, 04:27 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 14-09-2024, 04:54 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 09-09-2024, 10:11 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by MarcoP - 09-09-2024, 10:36 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 09-09-2024, 11:05 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RobGea - 09-09-2024, 07:57 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 09-09-2024, 09:00 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 10-09-2024, 12:12 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 10-09-2024, 04:24 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Torsten - 10-09-2024, 05:37 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Barbrey - 26-09-2024, 06:43 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 26-09-2024, 12:48 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Barbrey - 27-09-2024, 10:13 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Scarecrow - 27-09-2024, 07:21 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by RadioFM - 17-04-2025, 03:10 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 17-04-2025, 05:39 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Mauro - 17-04-2025, 06:47 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 07:51 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 19-04-2025, 08:04 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 01:00 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 19-04-2025, 02:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 19-04-2025, 01:08 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 02:10 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 19-04-2025, 02:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Mauro - 19-04-2025, 07:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 20-04-2025, 07:27 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by nablator - 10-05-2025, 11:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 11-05-2025, 04:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 05:00 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by dashstofsk - 11-05-2025, 06:06 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 07:51 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by nablator - 11-05-2025, 08:45 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 09:12 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by nablator - 11-05-2025, 09:23 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by R. Sale - 11-05-2025, 07:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 11-05-2025, 08:07 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 12:37 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by R. Sale - 11-05-2025, 09:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 02:03 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 12-05-2025, 03:41 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 04:17 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 04:34 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 12-05-2025, 04:35 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 04:40 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by Koen G - 12-05-2025, 04:54 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 12-05-2025, 07:40 PM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by ReneZ - 13-05-2025, 12:29 AM
RE: Why not positional variation? - by oshfdk - 13-05-2025, 08:04 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)