[split] Torsten's criticism of Bowern & Lindemann

[Aga Tentakulus]

   
   
   
I can certainly understand Torsten's criticism and scepticism.
I have watched the video again.
If I compare one of Lisa's arguments with the VM text, it just doesn't fit together. Differences in one character. Which in the VM would mean that the writers took turns in 2 words.
But I can't imagine that this is her only argument either.
As far as I'm concerned, it has nothing to do with writing tolerance. That's why there are already 5 gallows signs and not 4.
So Torsten's thought is justified.

Furthermore, if the differences (green) are already so striking. Why should I believe that it is different with (red)? Now there are already 6 gallows signs.
What about (blue)? Yes, it has too. Just not so easy to see. That makes 8 gallows signs.

How am I supposed to evaluate statistics if half of them are already wrong in the input?
The rule: Out of sight out of mind.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)