The manuscript is not a palimpsest
| Poll: The Voynich manuscript is not a palimpsest You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| I agree with this statement | 8 | 100.00% | |
| I disagree with this statement | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 8 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
The manuscript is not a palimpsest
|
 Member details
Posts: 3,012 Threads: 94 Thanks Received: 3,806 in 1,792 posts Thanks Given: 4037 Joined: Jan 2016 Reputation: 7 Location: Italy Country: 
(13-09-2016, 08:02 AM)Koen Gh. wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Are there any possible implications if the vellum has been re-used? 1. The support of the VMS would be a palimpsest 2. the carbon-dating would be much less relevant 3. the hypothesis that it is a false would be much more credible ... |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by davidjackson - 12-09-2016, 05:33 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by MarcoP - 12-09-2016, 05:44 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by davidjackson - 12-09-2016, 06:18 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by Anton - 12-09-2016, 09:37 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by -JKP- - 12-09-2016, 10:18 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by ReneZ - 13-09-2016, 07:24 AM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by Koen G - 13-09-2016, 08:02 AM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by MarcoP - 13-09-2016, 08:14 AM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by Anton - 04-10-2016, 10:08 AM
|
