12-09-2016, 06:18 PM
You are correct MarcoP. A manuscript is defined as "a book that is written by hand". Therefore, the statement is to be taken as the physical book.
The Voynich Ninja
›
Water Cooler
›
Archive
›
Voynich tasks
›
Positions we can agree upon
›
Approved blocks
The manuscript is not a palimpsest
The manuscript is not a palimpsest
| Poll: The Voynich manuscript is not a palimpsest You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| I agree with this statement | 8 | 100.00% | |
| I disagree with this statement | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 8 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
The manuscript is not a palimpsest
|
 Member details
Posts: 3,233 Threads: 251 Thanks Received: 1,189 in 679 posts Thanks Given: 394 Joined: Dec 2015 Reputation: 7 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by davidjackson - 12-09-2016, 05:33 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by MarcoP - 12-09-2016, 05:44 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by davidjackson - 12-09-2016, 06:18 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by Anton - 12-09-2016, 09:37 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by -JKP- - 12-09-2016, 10:18 PM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by ReneZ - 13-09-2016, 07:24 AM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by Koen G - 13-09-2016, 08:02 AM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by MarcoP - 13-09-2016, 08:14 AM
RE: The manuscript is not a palimpsest - by Anton - 04-10-2016, 10:08 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)