High ammount of bidirectional pairs

[quimqu]

Wow, such a great analysis from Marke Fincher. I didn't know about it. But the conclusions (as far as we can suppose) are the same: VMS does not look like to be written in a "normal" language, so, wether it is invented, or it is a normal language manipulated to a point that the natural relationships between words disappear.

In fact, I did the analysis because I had the impression, trying to read the MS, that the word were repeated constantly.

Thanks for the reply. I think that having some less or more pairs is not representative. What really matters is that those kind of high relations are not "natural".

Regards,

Hi quimqu,

Welcome to the forum.

The number of reversible unique pairs is R(w, 1) in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..

Ignoring unclear spaces (',' removed) and unclear words (that contain '?'):
Word tokens: 38162
Unique pairs: 34338
Reversible unique pairs: 2799

Ignoring unclear words only:
Word tokens: 40621
Unique pairs: 35234
Reversible unique pairs: 3327

Apparently you count a repeated word as two pairs (one unique pair in my count):

Pair 1: ('1oe', '1oe'), Count: 21
Pair 2: ('1oe', '1oe'), Count: 21

so you should have more pairs than me. We must be doing something differently.