12-09-2016, 12:36 PM
Trying to imagine scenarios where the spaces in the main text are 'arbitrary', yet the words are found back as labels, I tend to come up only with scenarios where the text isn't meaningful.
In that case, it's a moot point anyway.
I don't quite understand the point of Davidsch related to stems and grammar. I believe that the argument presented here is largely independent of this question. No assumption has been made whether the label words represent nouns, for example. It would start playing a role if one wanted to draw conclusions based on the actual percentages.
Another perhaps open point is that there are two types of labels. In the 'stricter' and original sense of the word, these are single words or small groups of words that are written near one specific drawing element.
Another group is made up of words that are standing alone, but not clearly near a drawing element.
In that case, it's a moot point anyway.
I don't quite understand the point of Davidsch related to stems and grammar. I believe that the argument presented here is largely independent of this question. No assumption has been made whether the label words represent nouns, for example. It would start playing a role if one wanted to draw conclusions based on the actual percentages.
Another perhaps open point is that there are two types of labels. In the 'stricter' and original sense of the word, these are single words or small groups of words that are written near one specific drawing element.
Another group is made up of words that are standing alone, but not clearly near a drawing element.