labels as words

[ThomasCoon]

Well, I guess this proves it. I was wrong about the spaces and will have to start from square 1 again!  

Translation: I still think I'm totally correct about the spaces

Hi Thomas, I am really sorry you find my efforts both useless and deserving of sarcasm. This is unexpected.

As Rene clearly wrote, this exercise does not "prove" anything. But these numbers could be evidence, and evidence is relevant to the formulation and evaluation of ideas.

These numbers could be explained as errors on my side (this should be easy to check and could provide more reliable evidence).

Another possible explanation is that "space defined words" and labels are significant and (in most cases) have the same meaning (as we can observe in the manuscripts we can read). 

I am looking forward to different and better explanations. I am in the fortunate position of not thinking I am totally correct about anything

Marco, I'm sorry - I didn't mean to come off as sarcastic or to insult your work (I actually have no desire to attack anyone personally) - but I see how my post reads that way, so I definitely apologize. My intention was to reply to the whole discussion about spaces happening here and in other threads. When I said "Well, this proves it", I meant "this [whole thread/discussion]" and not "this [specific task that Marco did]." Either way I could have definitely worded my post more carefully and I accept responsibility for that. For the record, I am impressed by your massive efforts here (I "Thanked" your post long before writing in this thread) and all the work you've done on the VMS. Every so often I'll watch a VMS presentation, and the speaker will say, "I received this information from a fellow named Marco Ponzi, who..."