New Post: "I Do Listen to the Experts. Do YOU?"

[asteckley]

Your point seems to be that the variation in dating amongst the people you call experts is so great that it demonstrates that there is a fundamental problem with their datings and so it must be a modern forgery.

I guess I missed it. I've never seen him say that.

Well, why then does he think that different people coming to different datings of the Voynich manuscript somehow supports the idea that it is a modern forgery.

My point is that different people coming to different datings of a medieval manuscript like this is probably quite normal. I suspect dating a medieval manuscript with no readable text is probably very hard to get right.

I have no dog in this fight. But I kind of marvel at Rich's patience in explaining the same thing over and over again.