26-04-2024, 07:27 PM
Rich
You don't seem to have understood me.
Your point seems to be that the variation in dating amongst the people you call experts is so great that it demonstrates that there is a fundamental problem with their datings and so it must be a modern forgery.
It seems to me that variation in dating of historical objects with no readable text by people is probably quite normal and so the different dating of different people is to be expected. How accurately do you expect an individual to be able to date an object of this kind? Lisa Fagin Davis pointed out that difficulties in dating medieval text like this is normal. Have you compared it to the dating of other medieval objects without readable text? How.accurate are they?
You don't seem to have understood me.
Your point seems to be that the variation in dating amongst the people you call experts is so great that it demonstrates that there is a fundamental problem with their datings and so it must be a modern forgery.
It seems to me that variation in dating of historical objects with no readable text by people is probably quite normal and so the different dating of different people is to be expected. How accurately do you expect an individual to be able to date an object of this kind? Lisa Fagin Davis pointed out that difficulties in dating medieval text like this is normal. Have you compared it to the dating of other medieval objects without readable text? How.accurate are they?