26-04-2024, 04:24 PM
(26-04-2024, 03:28 PM)Aga Tentakulus wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I don't have to invent things.
It's quite simple.
The C-14 test has opened the box. Schrödinger's cat is alive.
OK then, as I've said, I do not dispute the C14 (raw) test results. Will you answer a question? As these conversation often go, I am asked, over and over, to explain a great many things, and I do my best to answer every single question. And, as Maxwell Smart famously said, "And loving it!".
On the other hand, I ask counter questions, thousands over the years, and a high percentage of them get ignored. You have not addressed the core theme of this thread, in fact. And this is not as much a challenge, as genuine curiousity on my part, how you would answer this question, then:
"It is a fact that the overwhelming number of expert opinions, before the c14 tests were determined, actually believed that the Voynich was inked with it's lettering and illustrations at far different times than that dating eventually showed. Only one book cataloger, Lehmann-Haupt, in fact, matched those C14 dates. In addition, several post-C14 experts strongly feel the illustrations were added long after the creation of the calfskin. We also know (it is a fact, also) that blank parchment can, and has, sat for even centuries. So how do you explain that all these experts are wrong about the dating, and you are right?"
In the spirit of true discussion, your reasoning behind this is missing, and it would be very interesting for me to see how you explain it. I've shown you mine, how about you show me yours?
Rich.