23-04-2024, 03:51 AM
As should be well known to everyone, in the 1970's Prescott Currier identified two languages ("A" and "B") in the Voynich MS text.
I have been looking at consolidating and extending that work off and on in the past, and just recently completed a first iteration of such a consolidation and extension.
Most of the pages that Currier did not classify appear to be in some intermediate form, which I have decided to call "C" language. Furthermore, using quantitative criteria, all pages have now been classified into these three languages, and a number of sub-categories or dialects.
I consider this not a closed activity. There are still important properties of the text that have not been taken into account.
The details of this first stage are described briefly You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. .
I have been looking at consolidating and extending that work off and on in the past, and just recently completed a first iteration of such a consolidation and extension.
Most of the pages that Currier did not classify appear to be in some intermediate form, which I have decided to call "C" language. Furthermore, using quantitative criteria, all pages have now been classified into these three languages, and a number of sub-categories or dialects.
I consider this not a closed activity. There are still important properties of the text that have not been taken into account.
The details of this first stage are described briefly You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. .
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)