16-04-2024, 05:41 PM
(16-04-2024, 04:54 PM)asteckley wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Rene Zanbergen, Lisa Fagin-Davis, and Richard SantaColomo have all been consulted as experts on the manuscript.
All sorts of people have been consulted on the manuscript, but I think it very doubtful that many of them could be called experts, so that seems to me to be a poor criteria for being called an expert. (I base this on having seen a few Voynich documentaries and other things.)
To me an expert is someone whose opinion I can put my trust in. I think it is perfectly possible for someone to be trustworthy on a specific topic related to the Voynich, but in terms of a general understanding of the Voynich manuscript there is nobody I feel that I can put my trust in as there are so many basic questions that I cannot be confident that they have the correct answer to.
There are certainly people who are knowledgeable regarding the history of Voynich research up until now, but I hesitate to call them experts on the Voynich manuscript itself.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)