07-04-2024, 03:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-04-2024, 03:08 PM by Mark Knowles.)
(07-04-2024, 02:55 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(07-04-2024, 01:08 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(07-04-2024, 10:34 AM)Hermes777 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Garments and fashions in the ms. suggest earlier rather than later I think, but then a later illustrator may have been following existing illustrations (poorly) rather than drawing from life.
To me it appears to be a later attempted copy of an earlier drawing. People argue about the fashion, but I don't see the Voynich author being very concerned that the fashion is up to date in the drawings, especially given how crude the drawings are.
That sounds a lot like making the data fit the theory.
Whatever the data is it could clearly fit either dating. In fact the Diebold Lauber drawings which are most similar to the Voynich are later, which would support a later dating.
Maybe you are making the data fit your theory.
(07-04-2024, 02:55 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Allow me to put more trust in the opinion of a medieval MS curator specialised in this aspect, than in that of Voynich theorists.
Which curator are you referring to and what precisely did they say?

