03-04-2024, 07:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-04-2024, 07:03 PM by Mark Knowles.)
(03-04-2024, 06:46 PM)asteckley wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(03-04-2024, 05:33 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You don't listen to the people you list as experts as they don't say the manuscript is a modern fake.
Are you seriously trying to say that if the expert hasn't stated that they subscribe to particular theory that is supported BY their findings, then one is therefore not listening to that expert?!
If you listen selectively to the people you deem to be experts only taking onboard statements they may have made that support your ideas, then you cannot really be said to be listening to the expert. Listening to the expert should be listening to the entirety of what they say. If these experts are saying it is not a modern forgery then only focusing on the difference in their dating is ignored the complete picture. Of course, as I have said before, I think when it comes to the Voynich there are no experts.

