Right. What I'm getting at is that, taken over the whole manuscript, the amount of text is so large that things tend to cancel each other out to a surprising degree. You might notice that some of the stats you are looking at don't change all that much between a transliteration with and one without uncertain spaces.
Of course, it could be that there are specific features that are disproportionately affected by turning uncertain spaces on or off. Identifying those features might be interesting in and of itself.
Edit: I'm looking at it from a perspective where you'd be analyzing large sections of text. If you do a deep reading of a single paragraph, toggling uncertain spaces will have a large effect.
Of course, it could be that there are specific features that are disproportionately affected by turning uncertain spaces on or off. Identifying those features might be interesting in and of itself.
Edit: I'm looking at it from a perspective where you'd be analyzing large sections of text. If you do a deep reading of a single paragraph, toggling uncertain spaces will have a large effect.

