09-05-2023, 04:09 PM
(09-05-2023, 03:32 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.True, we are dealing with an additional level of uncertainty. Still, there must have been something in the 14thC text that resulted in a "gaismich" transcription.
I checked other occurrences of "gens" in this collection of documents and the only find with attribute was "gemast gens" which is, I guess, "fat" or "well-fed" geese.
Apparently this "gaismich", whatever it means, serves as attribute here. Which would be problematic for f116v, unless the phrase was cut in the middle.

