Any chance for nomenclator?

[nablator]

This is just another way of saying that what we observe in the VMS is not a natural flow of text, but the result of at least some process of shuffling, is not it?


However, to this argument one may object that it may have been just word-level shuffling, so this alone does not preclude a one-to-one codebook.

One-to-many is still possible (algorithmically, without a codebook): it keeps a low level of word pair correlation (also y.q) that shuffling would destroy.