On post #4 in this thread, I attached a diagram that highlights the hierarchy of consonants within the ending consonants in the most common quadgrams of the whole manuscript. It was unexpected of me to find such a thing, and all things considered, I think it defends the existence of a collection of C1VC2 combinations that could potentially have meanings which are yet to be found.
Noteworthy to notice that the way I build the syllables is CV where as the tokens appear in the text as VC, while V in the text is most often than not a collection of italic 'I' strokes ranging from zero to four.
Noteworthy to notice that the way I build the syllables is CV where as the tokens appear in the text as VC, while V in the text is most often than not a collection of italic 'I' strokes ranging from zero to four.