23-02-2023, 03:47 AM
The point is to find an explanation.
Again.
If one hand were to write the text mainly in the second person, the number of endings used would inevitably increase. These remain constant.
If narratives were written in the first person, the picture would be completely different.
If I start from the frequency of endings in the VM, the 2 obverse endings are "xx-iin" and "xx-g" (xxtis + xxus/um).
Now the application of the PC programmes should shed more light on the picture.
Only endings should be used here, therefore single "8g" combinations should not be considered.
If a hand had many more of the endings, it can be assumed that he is writing in the second person. But this also gives an indication that it is not a thrown-together text, since he is already working according to a rule.
The dialect form may allow some leeway, but rules apply here too.