k/t gallows reduplication

[nablator]

I guess that 'k' sequences are partly explained by the fact that 'k' is much more frequent than 't' in Currier B.

Hi MarcoP,

I'll do the calculation for Currier A and Currier B separately, then page per page. Maybe the large imbalance of the k:t ratio on some page is enough to explain most of the long sequences.

It's as if they tried to compensate the lesser frequency of t with longer sequences of t than k. Just an idea, I don't know.