04-02-2023, 05:54 AM
Koen, why do your recent VM graphs look so different from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. regarding small window sizes? Are they smoothed and extrapolated towards 0? It would be helpful to display the actual data points in the graphs as dots.
On page 1, your VM graphs are way more 'wavy' for window sizes 2-5 and even move downward until 5 for Q20 before sharply rising again. The new graphs are almost perfectly resembling logarithmic or You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.equations without the slightest wavyness over the 14 datapoints you measured and look highly artificial, in stark contrast to all other manuscripts where graphs tend to undulate as one would expect. I also see you didn't calculate window sizes 2 and 4 for the new graphs. Why not? I think more datapoints would be helpful to investigate differences between the VM texts, e.g. window size 4,6,7,10.
Please check if the VM texts really generate such perfect and perfectly similar MATTR curves. Also I find it extremely peculiar that shuffling Herbal A results in almost exactly the same graph as Q20.
On page 1, your VM graphs are way more 'wavy' for window sizes 2-5 and even move downward until 5 for Q20 before sharply rising again. The new graphs are almost perfectly resembling logarithmic or You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.equations without the slightest wavyness over the 14 datapoints you measured and look highly artificial, in stark contrast to all other manuscripts where graphs tend to undulate as one would expect. I also see you didn't calculate window sizes 2 and 4 for the new graphs. Why not? I think more datapoints would be helpful to investigate differences between the VM texts, e.g. window size 4,6,7,10.
Please check if the VM texts really generate such perfect and perfectly similar MATTR curves. Also I find it extremely peculiar that shuffling Herbal A results in almost exactly the same graph as Q20.